|
The Markets
Risk-on. Risk-off. If you read the financial press, you may have seen the terms “risk-on” and “risk-off”. When investing, there is a risk-return spectrum. Stocks typically have higher risk and higher return potential than high-quality bonds. High-quality bonds have lower risk and lower return potential than stocks, although they typically have higher risk and higher return potential than cash. In financial speak, investors are:
Last week, investors moved from a risk-on to a risk-off outlook. The change in attitude resulted from concerns about:
During periods of market volatility, it’s important to keep a long-term perspective. Having an asset allocation strategy that reflects your risk tolerance and financial goals helps insulate your assets from market turbulence. Asset allocation helps manage risk, but it does not prevent losses. Last week, major U.S. stock indices moved lower. Yields on U.S. Treasuries were mixed. The Markets
The market whisperer… Last week, the Federal Reserve (Fed) left the federal funds rate unchanged, and Fed Chair Jerome Powell soothed markets. He explained that conditions in the labor market were broadly in balance and inflation had eased significantly over the past two years. Overall, the possibility of recession, while rising, remained low. Markets rallied following his comments. The economic outlook for 2025 The Fed’s current median forecast for economic growth in 2025 is 1.7 percent, a bit lower than it was in December. In addition, the Fed’s current median estimate for inflation is 2.7 percent, a bit higher than in December. While he was reassuring, Powell explained there is a lot of uncertainty about the economic outlook in the United States. He stated: “Looking ahead, the new administration is in the process of implementing significant policy changes in four distinct areas: trade, immigration, fiscal policy and regulation. It is the net effect of these policy changes that will matter for the economy and for the path of all monetary policy. While there have been recent developments in some of these areas, especially trade policy, uncertainty around the changes and their effects on the economic outlook is high. As we parse the incoming information, we are focused on separating the signal from the noise as the outlook evolves.” Consumer spending and the wealth effect Powell also said that it remains to be seen how consumer and business spending and investment will respond to heightened uncertainty about the economic outlook. It’s an important point because of the “wealth effect”. The wealth effect is a theory in behavioral economics. It holds that people spend more when the stock market is rising and the value of their assets is growing. Conversely, people spend less when the stock market is falling and the value of their assets is declining. It’s difficult to quantify the effect as Mike Bird of The Economist explained: “Estimates of the ‘wealth effect’ – the amount that rising or falling stocks can support or hurt consumer activity – vary wildly. One academic study in 2019 suggested that a dollar increase in stock market wealth boosted American spending by about three cents. [A large financial-services firm] suggests that the pass-through has risen significantly in recent years, coming up with an extraordinary figure of 24 cents. Whatever the true number, a declining stock market matters for the broader economy.” Last week, major U.S. stock indices finished higher, while yields on most maturities of U.S. Treasuries moved lower. The Markets
A correction and a bounce. Last week, the Standard & Poor’s (S&P) 500 Index moved into correction territory. The Nasdaq Composite Index (Nasdaq) was already in a correction, and the Dow Jones Industrial Average (Dow) was close, reported Paul R. LaMonica of Barron’s. A correction occurs when the value of an index drops 10 percent below its most recent peak. The S&P 500 correction occurred remarkably quickly. Just three weeks ago, the index was at a record high amid easing inflation pressures and solid earnings growth. In fact, from December 15 through March 6, the number of companies mentioning the word “recession” on earnings calls was the lowest it had been in more than five years, reported John Butters of FactSet. There is another word that was mentioned frequently on earnings calls though: tariffs. Tariffs on tariffs on tariffs The tariff war escalated last week as the European Union (EU) and Canada introduced retaliatory tariffs in response to those of the United States, reported Joe Light of Barron’s. Brendan Murray and Alex Newman of Bloomberg have been tracking the tariffs. Through the end of last week, the United States government has imposed the following tariffs:
“As Americans debate the wisdom of the administration’s on-again, off-again trade barriers…a few broad points are worth bearing in mind,” wrote The Editorial Board at Bloomberg. “One is that these measures are a tax on Americans. Foreign countries don’t simply pay up; US companies do when they import a product. This means that the costs are ultimately borne by consumers and by companies that use imported inputs. The effect of those higher prices is to eat into household budgets, push down real wages and reduce economic growth.” However, an alternative viewpoint would argue that we are currently subsidizing other nations by allowing them to restrict our goods coming into their country, either because of their tariffs or other restrictions placed on our goods, and it has been happening for decades. Additionally, the Trump Administration has stated it plans to offer a lower corporate tax rate to companies who relocate or build their production facilities in the U.S. This should result in greater economic development and greater employment for American workers. If the ultimate goal is to have more goods produced in America by American workers earning wages from American-based companies, then placing reciprocal tariffs on foreign goods coming into our country could make more sense for the long term. Consumers are feeling salty The trade war has raised questions about the path of the U.S. economy, and some economists have lowered their forecasts for economic growth in 2025, reported Brian Swint of Barron’s. The primary driver of U.S. economic growth is consumer spending and consumers – anyone and everyone who buys things – are feeling less optimistic. Last week, the University of Michigan Survey of Consumers reported that sentiment fell 10.5 percent from February to March. Surveys of Consumers Director Joanne Hsu wrote: “Sentiment has now fallen for three consecutive months and is currently down 22 [percent] from December 2024. While current economic conditions were little changed, expectations for the future deteriorated across multiple facets of the economy, including personal finances, labor markets, inflation, business conditions, and stock markets. Many consumers cited the high level of uncertainty around policy and other economic factors; frequent gyrations in economic policies make it very difficult for consumers to plan for the future.” Major U.S. stock indices fell over much of last week before recovering some losses on Friday. The S&P 500, Nasdaq and Dow all finished the week more than two percent lower. U.S. Treasury yields bobbed lower before finishing the week close to where they were the previous Friday. The Markets
What do weather and investing have in common? From 1991 to 2020, the average temperature of the United States was 54.7° Fahrenheit. Of course, that doesn’t mean the temperature in every state on every day was 54.7°F. The weather varied dramatically from place to place and month to month. The same is true of investment averages. At the end of February, the average annual total return* for the Standard & Poor’s (S&P) 500 Index over the past 10 years was 12.98 percent. That doesn’t mean the S&P 500 returned 12.98 percent every year – it didn’t. The index’s total return varied dramatically from year to year. The S&P 500 Index doesn’t provide level returns. In some years returns can be encouragingly positive, and in other years returns are depressingly and even scarily negative – leaving you wondering if your portfolio can dig itself back out of the hole it just dug. After two years, of stellar returns from U.S. stocks, the market recently has been experiencing a pull back, leaving individual investors, again, somewhat cautious about the short term, while institutional investors appear bullish for the longer term. Last week, U.S. financial markets were volatile. “A roller-coaster week for markets ended on that same note, with stocks whipsawing as traders tried to make sense of a myriad of headlines around the economy, tariffs and geopolitical developments. Just minutes after a slide that drove the S&P 500 down over 1 [percent], the gauge staged an ‘oversold bounce’ as Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell said the economy is fine. The Nasdaq 100 briefly breached the threshold of a correction. Bonds fell,” reported Rita Nazareth of Bloomberg. In contrast, some European stock markets moved higher last week. “President Donald Trump’s drive to shake up the world order is creating some surprising winners. As the U.S. stock market reels from tariff fears, German stocks are surging because the government has committed to almost $1 trillion in new spending on infrastructure and defense…The sea change in policy is creating a giddy optimism in German markets not seen in decades,” reported Brian Swint of Barron’s. The divergence in performance brings home the value of a diversified portfolio. When markets are volatile, remain confident and resist the impulse to react to short-term performance. The assets in your portfolio were carefully chosen to help you reach your financial goals. Unless your goals and risk tolerance have changed, your asset allocation shouldn’t. The weight of evidence accumulated over previous decades supports the idea that staying the course – holding a well-allocated and diversified portfolio and rebalancing periodically – is a sound way to pursue long-term financial goals. Last week, major U.S. stock indices finished the week lower despite a rebound on Friday. U.S. Treasury yields were mixed last week with yields for shorter maturities dropping while yields on longer maturities rose. *Total return includes reinvested dividends. The Markets
Is it supposed to be doing that? At the end of last year, economists believed the chance of a recession in 2025 was relatively low. In December, economist Torsten Sløk wrote, “The outlook for the US economy remains strong with no signs of a major slowdown going into 2025.” The economy has not been performing as expected, though. “The U.S. Citi Economic Surprise Index, which tracks the difference between economic data and expectations, has fallen to its lowest level in almost six months. The index rises when the surprises are favorable, so the decline means the data are showing a less robust U.S. economy than expected,” reported Jacob Sonenshine of Barron’s. One surprising piece of data is the slump in U.S. consumer confidence. The University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment Survey reported that consumers have become less optimistic. Sentiment declined by 9.8 percent from January to February. The Conference Board Consumer Confidence Index showed a 7.0 percent drop over the same period. “The decrease was unanimous across groups by age, income, and wealth…Year-ahead inflation expectations jumped up from 3.3 [percent] last month to 4.3 [percent] this month, the highest reading since November 2023 and marking two consecutive months of unusually large increases,” reported Surveys of Consumers Director Joanne Hsu. The slump in sentiment is concerning because consumer spending is the primary driver of U.S. economic growth – accounting for about two-thirds of gross domestic product (GDP), which is the value of all goods and services produced in the country over a certain period. In general, when consumers are uneasy, spending tends to slow and so does economic growth. Currently, one consumer group has more influence than others do. When analysts took a closer look at consumer spending, they found a growing wealth gap. “The wealthiest 10% of American households—those making more than $250,000 a year, roughly—are now responsible for half of all US consumer spending and at least a third of the country’s gross domestic product,” reported Amanda Mull of Bloomberg. “In the 1990s, spending by top-decile earners usually constituted a third or so of annual consumer spending overall. Now, their spending constitutes the largest share of the consumer economy in data going back to 1989.” Last Friday, we learned that consumer spending declined 0.5 percent month to month, after inflation, in January. It was the biggest monthly decline in almost four years. “US consumers unexpectedly pulled back on spending on goods like cars in January amid extreme winter weather, and a slowdown in services, if sustained, may raise concerns about the resilience of the economy,” reported Augusta Saraiva of Bloomberg. While we’ve seen a lot of uncertainty and some softer-than-expected economic data, the likelihood of a recession over the next 12 months remains low. Economists polled by The Wall Street Journal’s Economic Forecasting Survey put the odds at 22 percent, reported Andy Serwer of Barron’s. No matter where the economy is headed, investors can manage the risks associated with market volatility through asset allocation and diversification. If you have not reviewed your portfolio recently, this is a good time to make sure your asset allocation is appropriate for your financial goals and risk tolerance. If you would like help, let us know. Last week, the Dow Jones Industrial Average moved higher, while the Standard & Poor’s 500 and Nasdaq Composite Indexes moved lower. Treasuries rallied and the yield on the benchmark 10-year U.S. Treasury moved lower over the week. The Markets A difference of opinion. Broadly speaking, there are two types of investors: individual investors and institutional investors. Individual investors buy and sell investments to grow their personal wealth. This group of investors often works with financial advisors as they pursue their financial goals. Individual investors tend to invest smaller amounts of money than institutional investors do. For the last three weeks, sentiment among individual investors has been leaning bearish. Last week, 40.5 percent of investors in the AAII Investor Sentiment Survey were feeling pessimistic about the direction of stocks over the next six months. That was an improvement from the prior week’s reading when 47.3 percent of participants were bearish. Here’s what the survey has found since the week of January 20.  The AAII Investor Sentiment Survey is considered a contrarian indicator, meaning that people look at the survey to identify potential turning points in the market. In some instances, when investors have been pessimistic, the market has moved higher, and vice versa, reported Edward Harrison of Bloomberg.
Institutional investors are very large investors, such as banks, mutual funds, exchange traded funds, college endowments, state pensions, insurance companies, and other organizations that buy and sell investments, usually in very large volumes, to meet the goals of the group for whom they’re investing. Currently, institutional investors are quite bullish. According to survey results released last week by Bank of America (BofA), many institutional investors are fully invested and holding very little cash. “Global stocks have become the most popular asset class with [institutional] investors, who are showing the biggest willingness to take risk in 15 years,” reported Sagarika Jaisinghani of Bloomberg. “About 89 [percent] of respondents in the BofA survey said US equities were overvalued, the most since at least April 2001. The faith in so-called U.S. exceptionalism — where investors bet mainly on American financial markets — has also faltered as investors rotate into European stocks.” Last week, major U.S. stock indices moved lower on discouraging economic data and inflation concerns, reported Connor Smith of Barron’s. The yield on the benchmark 10-year U.S. Treasury moved lower over the week. The Markets
Why are stock markets wary of tariffs? In two of the last three weeks, tariff announcements led to late week stock market sell-offs. Stocks quickly recovered lost value, but uncertainty about the administration’s trade policy and the potential impact of that policy on U.S. companies remained. That’s likely to be the case until it becomes clear whether the Trump administration sees tariffs as a negotiating tactic or a means to cover the cost of extending 2017 tax cuts. If tariffs are a negotiating tactic and unlikely to be implemented, the effect on the U.S. economy, businesses, and stocks may be less significant than if tariffs are put in place. The Tax Foundation evaluated the administration’s proposal for a universal baseline tariff and reported, “the 10 percent tariff would generate $2 trillion of increased revenue, while the 20 percent tariff would generate $3.3 trillion over a decade.” While increased tax revenue is alluring, the catch is that tariffs are taxes added to the prices of materials and goods purchased by American businesses. Often, the cost is passed on to consumers, reported Anshu Siripurapu and Noah Berman of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). As a result, the trillions of dollars that could be generated would come from American pockets. According to CFR estimates: “A 25 percent tariff on Canada and Mexico will raise production costs for U.S. automakers, adding up to $3,000 to the price of some of the roughly sixteen million cars sold in the United States each year. Grocery costs could rise, too, as Mexico is the United States’ biggest source of fresh produce, supplying more than 60 percent of U.S. vegetable imports and nearly half of all fruit and nut imports.” Higher prices may reduce demand for goods and services, slowing sales and reducing companies’ profits (and earnings). If earnings growth slows, publicly traded companies’ stock prices could be affected. David Kostin, chief U.S. equity strategist at Goldman Sachs Research reported, “...every five-percentage-point increase in the U.S. tariff rate is estimated to reduce [Standard & Poor’s 500 Index] earnings per share by roughly 1-2 [percent].” Goldman’s estimates suggest the 10 percent tariff placed on China in early February could raise the effective U.S. tariff rate by about 4.7 percentage points. In addition, businesses may be vulnerable to retaliatory tariffs imposed by other nations. For example, “American farmers and ranchers incurred the most widespread damage from this retaliation following the 2018 tariffs. The damage was so great that the [first] Trump administration authorized $61 billion in emergency relief payments to cushion farmers and ranchers from the blow…an amount roughly equivalent to all of the tariff revenue collected from U.S. businesses,” reported Adam S. Hersh and Josh Bivens of The Economic Policy Institute. Investors appeared to shrug off concerns about tariffs and trade wars last week. Denitsa Tsekova of Bloomberg reported, “This week’s vow for reciprocal tariffs comes not long after [President Trump] delayed threats against Canada and Mexico, signaling to many investors that he won’t take action that enacts lasting damage to Wall Street.” Last week, higher than expected inflation numbers and weaker than expected retail sales data gave investors pause, but major U.S. stock indices finished the week higher. The yield on the benchmark 10-year U.S. Treasury moved lower over the week. The Guidance Wealth Office will be closed on
Monday, February 17th, in observance of Presidents Day. The Markets Optimism headed south on Friday. After rising for most of the week, stock markets lost momentum last Friday as economic data raised doubts about further Federal Reserve rate cuts, reported Rita Nazareth of Bloomberg. Late in the day, President Trump announced new tariffs would be imposed this week, and stocks dropped into negative territory. Consumer Sentiment Fell Sharply Last week, the University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment Index reported that consumer confidence, which tumbled four percent in January, fell another five percent in February. “Consumer sentiment fell for the second straight month, dropping about 5 [percent] to reach its lowest reading since July 2024. The decrease was pervasive, with Republicans, Independents, and Democrats all posting sentiment declines from January, along with consumers across age and wealth groups. Furthermore, all five index components deteriorated this month, led by a 12 [percent] slide in buying conditions for durables, in part due to a perception that it may be too late to avoid the negative impact of tariff policy. Expectations for personal finances sank about 6 [percent] from last month, again seen across all political affiliations, reaching its lowest value since October 2023. Many consumers appear worried that high inflation will return within the next year,” wrote Surveys of Consumers Director Joanne Hsu. Rising inflation could keep the Federal Reserve from lowering rates further. Survey participants expected prices to rise 4.3 percent over the next 12 months. That is a full point higher than in the previous month, when they anticipated prices would rise by 3.3 percent. Over the longer term, inflation expectations were steadier, rising from 3.2 percent to 3.3 percent. Tariff Talk Took A Toll In a Friday afternoon press conference, President Trump indicated he will implement reciprocal tariffs next week, although he did not specify which countries will be affected. “The tariffs would be the next volley in a trade war pitting the U.S. against some of its largest trading partners. Trump announced levies of 25 [percent] against Canadian and Mexican imports last weekend, though suspended them for a month after the countries agreed to increased border security and measures to reduce the flow of illegal drugs into the [United States]. A separate 10 percent tariff against Chinese imports went into effect, and China responded with tariffs of its own,” reported Joe Light of Barron’s. Employment Remained Relatively Stable In January The U.S. employment report showed hiring was solid in January, but less robust than expected, reported Lucia Mutikani of Reuters. The data showed “strong wage growth last month, with average hourly earnings surging by the most in five months, which should keep consumer spending supported.” While a steady labor market was encouraging, investors have some concerns about the future, reported Megan Leonhardt of Barron’s. “Looking ahead, employment conditions could face more headwinds as federal policy changes take hold, and many economists expect to see further weakening within the U.S. labor market this year. The shifts in trade and immigration policies, in particular, could upend the relative stability currently on view in the labor market, as well as impede the downward progress inflation has made.” On Friday, major United States stock indices gave back gains from earlier in the week and ended the week lower. The yield on the benchmark 10-year U.S. Treasury moved lower over the full week before rising on Friday. The Markets
Wait! What just happened? Last week, investors were inundated with market-moving data and news. Stock markets gyrated as investors tried to process everything that was occurring. Here’s some of what happened: China surprised the artificial intelligence industry The week got off to a rough start with major United States stock indices declining sharply on concerns about competition from China in the artificial intelligence (AI) space. AI-related technology stocks sold off after a Chinese start up released a less expensive AI model, raising concerns that current tech stock valuations may be too rich, reported Rita Nazareth of Bloomberg. Over the course of the week, markets “clawed back most of those losses thanks to encouraging earnings and company strategy updates, and as some investors re-evaluated the risks U.S. firms face from Chinese competition,” reported Barron’s. Companies performed well Last week, fourth quarter earnings reports bolstered investor optimism. So far, 36 percent of the companies in the Standard & Poor’s (S&P) 500 Index have reported on fourth quarter earnings. Seventy-seven percent of those companies have reported earnings that exceeded estimates, reported John Butters of FactSet. Economic growth continued In addition to upbeat earnings news, economic data released last week showed the U.S. economy continued to grow in the fourth quarter of 2024. “The [economic growth] figures cap another solid year for the world’s largest economy that defied expectations for a marked slowdown as consumers hung tough in the face of persistent inflation and high borrowing costs. The economy grew 2.8 [percent] in 2024 after expanding 2.9 [percent] and 2.5 [percent] in the prior two years, respectively,” reported Molly Smith of Bloomberg. Inflation persisted Last week’s inflation data was less encouraging. The Personal Consumption Expenditures Index, which is one of the Federal Reserve’s favored inflation measures, showed that headline inflation moved higher in December, rising to 2.6 percent annualized from 2.4 percent annualized in the previous month. Core inflation remained steady at 2.8 percent annualized. The Federal Reserve paused The Fed left rates unchanged last week. The range for the federal funds rate remained 4.25 percent to 4.50 percent. The accompanying statement said, “the risks to achieving [the Fed’s] employment and inflation goals are roughly in balance. The economic outlook is uncertain, and the Committee is attentive to the risks to both sides of its dual mandate.” Stocks moved lower initially but calmed after the Fed Chair offered assurances that monetary policy is well-positioned for whatever may be ahead, reported Caroline Valetkevitch of Reuters. Uncertainty abounded Government policy proposals arrived at a rapid pace, creating uncertainty. The White House Office of Management and Budget issued a memo temporarily pausing disbursement of government grants and loans, but no one was certain how the pause would affect the economy. “The federal government gives $1 trillion in grants to state and local governments alone, for everything from physical infrastructure and public safety to health and social services. Removing this money from the economy would represent a huge economic shock,” reported Samantha Sanders and Josh Bivens of the Economic Policy Institute. A federal judge temporarily blocked the freeze. Tariffs threats loomed Tariff talk had a more immediate effect on markets than the spending pause. U.S stocks slipped lower on Friday after the White House indicated it will move forward with tariffs on Canada, Mexico, and China, reported Connor Smith of Barron’s. “Investors are bracing for a looming hit to U.S. corporate profits and pressure on inflation if President Donald Trump makes good on his tariff threats, with markets seen as not fully factoring in risks from higher levies on foreign imports,” reported Laura Matthews, Lewis Krauskopf and Suzanne McGee of Reuters. Investors had a lot to consider last week. As the dust settled and the exchanges closed for the week, the Dow Jones Industrial Average had recovered its losses and moved slightly higher. The S&P 500 and Nasdaq Composite Indices had regained some losses but ended the week lower. All three indices had gains over the full month, reported Lisa Kailai Han of CNBC. The yield on the benchmark 10-year U.S. Treasury fell sharply on Monday and moved higher over the week. The Guidance Wealth office will close early on Thursday, January 30th at 4:00pm. The Markets What moves financial markets? The short answer is: Lots of things! Almost one hundred years ago, Benjamin Graham and David L. Dodd wrote, “the market is a voting machine, whereon countless individuals register choices which are the product partly of reason and partly of emotion.” Today, the same holds true. Stock prices are influenced by many factors. Here are three examples: 1. Market trends. Last year, companies with strong momentum characteristics—meaning their prices were trending higher—generally did well. “The main rationale behind momentum investing is that once a trend is well-established, it is likely to continue,” reported the Corporate Finance Institute. The idea may seem contrary to the primary rule of investing, sell high and buy low, but the approach is backed by academic research. It “captures the tendency for market trends to persist for a while, whether it’s because more investors are jumping in or are late to absorb new information,” reported Justina Lee of Bloomberg. As one researcher told Lee, “Momentum investing is great until it’s not.” 2. Investor sentiment. Emotion plays a significant role in stock market volatility. For example, last week, we saw a relief rally. Asian stocks rose and the Standard & Poor’s (S&P) 500 Index hit a new high because the news was less bad than investors had expected. Isabelle Lee, Lu Wang, and Phil Serafino of Bloomberg explained: “Despite the protectionist threats of the campaign trail, Trump held off on imposing levies on key trading partners this week, and just last night delivered his most mollifying message yet to China by saying that he would rather not have to use tariffs against the world’s second-biggest economy. Cue a relief rally across markets.” 3. Company fundamentals. Graham and Dodd recommended fundamental analysis to identify stocks with good value. Investors who rely on fundamental analysis study companies’ financial statements, and consider assets and liabilities, revenue and expenses, earnings and cash flow, and other factors. Then they do some math to evaluate the company’s value using various measures like the price-to-earnings ratio. In theory, a company with a low share price relative to its earnings is a good value. No one knows how markets will perform over the short term. That’s one reason it’s important to hold a diversified portfolio. Owning investments that perform differently in various market conditions helps manage investment risk and may smooth returns over time. Last week, major U.S. stock indices rose. The S&P 500 moved higher over the week, the Dow Jones Industrial Average gained 2.2 percent, and the Nasdaq Composite rose 1.7 percent, reported Paul R. LaMonica of Barron’s. Yields on U.S. Treasuries were relatively steady. |
Archives
May 2025
|
RSS Feed